This commit is contained in:
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ namespace AyaNova.Biz
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.CONCURRENCY_CONFLICT);
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, dbObject.Id, BizType, AyaEvent.Modified), ct);
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, putObject.Id, BizType, AyaEvent.Modified), ct);
|
||||
await SearchIndexAsync(putObject, false);
|
||||
await TagBiz.ProcessUpdateTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, putObject.Tags, dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
await HandlePotentialNotificationEvent(AyaEvent.Modified, putObject, dbObject);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ namespace AyaNova.Biz
|
||||
|
||||
I guess just implementing a very simple portion like from wo down to item down to a single grandchild makes the most sense
|
||||
|
||||
todo: Don't all *child items require a transaction to be passed for *any* crud op, i.e. including put and etc?
|
||||
As they might be called from a parent transaction?
|
||||
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -627,7 +629,7 @@ namespace AyaNova.Biz
|
||||
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
|
||||
#region WorkOrderState level
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//EXISTS
|
||||
@@ -841,10 +843,8 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//CREATE
|
||||
//
|
||||
internal async Task<WorkOrderItem> ItemCreateAsync(WorkOrderItem dtNewObject)
|
||||
internal async Task<WorkOrderItem> ItemCreateAsync(WorkOrderItem newObject)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WorkOrderItem newObject = new WorkOrderItem();
|
||||
CopyObject.Copy(dtNewObject, newObject);
|
||||
await ItemValidateAsync(newObject, null);
|
||||
if (HasErrors)
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
@@ -874,17 +874,17 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
//https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/querying/related-data
|
||||
//docs say this will not query twice but will recognize the duplicate woitem bit which is required for multiple grandchild collections
|
||||
var ret =
|
||||
await ct.WorkOrderItem
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Expenses)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Labors)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Loans)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Parts)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.PartRequests)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.ScheduledUsers)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Tasks)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Travels)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Units)
|
||||
.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
await ct.WorkOrderItem.AsNoTracking()
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Expenses)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Labors)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Loans)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Parts)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.PartRequests)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.ScheduledUsers)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Tasks)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Travels)
|
||||
.Include(wi => wi.Units)
|
||||
.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
if (logTheGetEvent && ret != null)
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, id, AyaType.WorkOrderItem, AyaEvent.Retrieved), ct);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
@@ -894,48 +894,42 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//UPDATE
|
||||
//
|
||||
internal async Task<WorkOrderItem> ItemPutAsync(WorkOrderItem dtPutObject)
|
||||
internal async Task<WorkOrderItem> ItemPutAsync(WorkOrderItem putObject)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
WorkOrderItem dbObject = await ct.WorkOrderItem.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == dtPutObject.Id);
|
||||
var dbObject = await ItemGetAsync(putObject.Id, false);
|
||||
if (dbObject == null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_FOUND, "id");
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// make a snapshot of the original for validation but update the original to preserve workflow
|
||||
WorkOrderItem SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj = new WorkOrderItem();
|
||||
CopyObject.Copy(dbObject, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj);
|
||||
|
||||
//Replace the db object with the PUT object
|
||||
CopyObject.Copy(dtPutObject, dbObject, "Id");
|
||||
|
||||
dbObject.Tags = TagBiz.NormalizeTags(dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
dbObject.CustomFields = JsonUtil.CompactJson(dbObject.CustomFields);
|
||||
|
||||
ct.Entry(dbObject).OriginalValues["Concurrency"] = dtPutObject.Concurrency;
|
||||
await ItemValidateAsync(dbObject, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj);
|
||||
if (HasErrors)
|
||||
if (dbObject.Concurrency != putObject.Concurrency)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.CONCURRENCY_CONFLICT);
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
putObject.Tags = TagBiz.NormalizeTags(putObject.Tags);
|
||||
putObject.CustomFields = JsonUtil.CompactJson(putObject.CustomFields);
|
||||
|
||||
await ItemValidateAsync(putObject, dbObject);
|
||||
if (HasErrors) return null;
|
||||
ct.Replace(dbObject, putObject);
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
await ct.SaveChangesAsync();
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (DbUpdateConcurrencyException)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!await ItemExistsAsync(dtPutObject.Id))
|
||||
if (!await ItemExistsAsync(putObject.Id))
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_FOUND);
|
||||
else
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.CONCURRENCY_CONFLICT);
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, dbObject.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItem, AyaEvent.Modified), ct);
|
||||
await ItemSearchIndexAsync(dbObject, false);
|
||||
await TagBiz.ProcessUpdateTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, dbObject.Tags, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj.Tags);
|
||||
await ItemHandlePotentialNotificationEvent(AyaEvent.Modified, dbObject, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj);
|
||||
return dbObject;
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, putObject.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItem, AyaEvent.Modified), ct);
|
||||
await ItemSearchIndexAsync(putObject, false);
|
||||
await TagBiz.ProcessUpdateTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, putObject.Tags, dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
await ItemHandlePotentialNotificationEvent(AyaEvent.Modified, putObject, dbObject);
|
||||
return putObject;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
@@ -948,7 +942,12 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
transaction = await ct.Database.BeginTransactionAsync();
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
WorkOrderItem dbObject = await ct.WorkOrderItem.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
var dbObject = await ItemGetAsync(id, false);
|
||||
if (dbObject == null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_FOUND);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ItemValidateCanDelete(dbObject);
|
||||
if (HasErrors)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@@ -966,38 +965,38 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
|
||||
//Delete children
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in ExpenseIds)
|
||||
if (!await ExpenseDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await ExpenseDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in LaborIds)
|
||||
if (!await LaborDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await LaborDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in LoanIds)
|
||||
if (!await LoanDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await LoanDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in PartIds)
|
||||
if (!await PartDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await PartDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in PartRequestIds)
|
||||
if (!await PartRequestDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await PartRequestDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in ScheduledUserIds)
|
||||
if (!await ScheduledUserDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await ScheduledUserDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in TaskIds)
|
||||
if (!await TaskDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await TaskDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in TravelIds)
|
||||
if (!await TravelDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await TravelDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
foreach (long ItemId in UnitIds)
|
||||
if (!await UnitDeleteAsync(ItemId))
|
||||
if (!await UnitDeleteAsync(ItemId, transaction))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
ct.WorkOrderItem.Remove(dbObject);
|
||||
await ct.SaveChangesAsync();
|
||||
|
||||
//Log event
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.DeleteObjectLogAsync(UserId, AyaType.WorkOrderItem, dbObject.Id, "wo:" + dbObject.WorkOrderId.ToString(), ct);
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.DeleteObjectLogAsync(UserId, AyaType.WorkOrderItem, dbObject.Id, "wo:" + dbObject.WorkOrderId.ToString(), ct);//FIX wo?? Not sure what is best here; revisit
|
||||
await Search.ProcessDeletedObjectKeywordsAsync(dbObject.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItem, ct);
|
||||
await TagBiz.ProcessDeleteTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
await FileUtil.DeleteAttachmentsForObjectAsync(BizType, dbObject.Id, ct);
|
||||
@@ -1012,14 +1011,29 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
//Just re-throw for now, let exception handler deal, but in future may want to deal with this more here
|
||||
throw;
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (parentTransaction == null)
|
||||
await transaction.DisposeAsync();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private async Task ItemSearchIndexAsync(WorkOrderItem obj, bool isNew)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//SEARCH INDEXING
|
||||
var SearchParams = new Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters(UserTranslationId, obj.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItem);
|
||||
SearchParams.AddText(obj.Notes).AddText(obj.Wiki).AddText(obj.Tags).AddCustomFields(obj.CustomFields);
|
||||
|
||||
if (isNew)
|
||||
await Search.ProcessNewObjectKeywordsAsync(SearchParams);
|
||||
else
|
||||
await Search.ProcessUpdatedObjectKeywordsAsync(SearchParams);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public async Task<Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters> ItemGetSearchResultSummary(long id)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var obj = await ct.WorkOrderItem.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
var SearchParams = new Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters();
|
||||
if (obj != null)
|
||||
SearchParams.AddText(obj.Notes).AddText(obj.Wiki).AddText(obj.Tags).AddCustomFields(obj.CustomFields);
|
||||
return SearchParams;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//VALIDATION
|
||||
@@ -1069,27 +1083,6 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
private async Task ItemSearchIndexAsync(WorkOrderItem obj, bool isNew)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//SEARCH INDEXING
|
||||
var SearchParams = new Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters(UserTranslationId, obj.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItem);
|
||||
SearchParams.AddText(obj.Notes).AddText(obj.Wiki).AddText(obj.Tags).AddCustomFields(obj.CustomFields);
|
||||
|
||||
if (isNew)
|
||||
await Search.ProcessNewObjectKeywordsAsync(SearchParams);
|
||||
else
|
||||
await Search.ProcessUpdatedObjectKeywordsAsync(SearchParams);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public async Task<Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters> ItemGetSearchResultSummary(long id)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var obj = await ct.WorkOrderItem.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
var SearchParams = new Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters();
|
||||
if (obj != null)
|
||||
SearchParams.AddText(obj.Notes).AddText(obj.Wiki).AddText(obj.Tags).AddCustomFields(obj.CustomFields);
|
||||
return SearchParams;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
// NOTIFICATION PROCESSING
|
||||
//
|
||||
@@ -1180,36 +1173,31 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
|
||||
//https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/querying/related-data
|
||||
//docs say this will not query twice but will recognize the duplicate woitem bit which is required for multiple grandchild collections
|
||||
var ret =
|
||||
await ct.WorkOrderItemExpense
|
||||
.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
var ret = await ct.WorkOrderItemExpense.AsNoTracking().SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
if (logTheGetEvent && ret != null)
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, id, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense, AyaEvent.Retrieved), ct);
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, id, ret.AyaType, AyaEvent.Retrieved), ct);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//UPDATE
|
||||
//
|
||||
internal async Task<WorkOrderItemExpense> ExpensePutAsync(WorkOrderItemExpense dtPutObject)
|
||||
internal async Task<WorkOrderItemExpense> ExpensePutAsync(WorkOrderItemExpense putObject)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WorkOrderItemExpense dbObject = await ct.WorkOrderItemExpense.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == dtPutObject.Id);
|
||||
var dbObject = await ExpenseGetAsync(putObject.Id, false);
|
||||
if (dbObject == null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_FOUND, "id");
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// make a snapshot of the original for validation but update the original to preserve workflow
|
||||
WorkOrderItemExpense SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj = new WorkOrderItemExpense();
|
||||
CopyObject.Copy(dbObject, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj);
|
||||
CopyObject.Copy(dtPutObject, dbObject, "Id");
|
||||
|
||||
if (dbObject.Concurrency != putObject.Concurrency)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.CONCURRENCY_CONFLICT);
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// dbObject.Tags = TagBiz.NormalizeTags(dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
// dbObject.CustomFields = JsonUtil.CompactJson(dbObject.CustomFields);
|
||||
|
||||
ct.Entry(dbObject).OriginalValues["Concurrency"] = dtPutObject.Concurrency;
|
||||
await ExpenseValidateAsync(dbObject, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj);
|
||||
await ExpenseValidateAsync(putObject, dbObject);
|
||||
if (HasErrors) return null;
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -1217,86 +1205,53 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch (DbUpdateConcurrencyException)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!await ExpenseExistsAsync(dtPutObject.Id))
|
||||
if (!await ExpenseExistsAsync(putObject.Id))
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_FOUND);
|
||||
else
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.CONCURRENCY_CONFLICT);
|
||||
return null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, dbObject.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense, AyaEvent.Modified), ct);
|
||||
await ExpenseSearchIndexAsync(dbObject, false);
|
||||
//await TagBiz.ProcessUpdateTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, dbObject.Tags, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj.Tags);
|
||||
await ExpenseHandlePotentialNotificationEvent(AyaEvent.Modified, dbObject, SnapshotOfOriginalDBObj);
|
||||
return dbObject;
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.LogEventToDatabaseAsync(new Event(UserId, dbObject.Id, putObject.AyaType, AyaEvent.Modified), ct);
|
||||
await ExpenseSearchIndexAsync(putObject, false);
|
||||
//await TagBiz.ProcessUpdateTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, putObject.Tags, dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
await ExpenseHandlePotentialNotificationEvent(AyaEvent.Modified, putObject, dbObject);
|
||||
return putObject;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//DELETE
|
||||
//
|
||||
internal async Task<bool> ExpenseDeleteAsync(long id)
|
||||
internal async Task<bool> ExpenseDeleteAsync(long id, Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Storage.IDbContextTransaction parentTransaction = null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WorkOrderItemExpense dbObject = await ct.WorkOrderItemExpense.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
ExpenseValidateCanDelete(dbObject);
|
||||
if (HasErrors)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
ct.WorkOrderItemExpense.Remove(dbObject);
|
||||
await ct.SaveChangesAsync();
|
||||
Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Storage.IDbContextTransaction transaction = null;
|
||||
if (parentTransaction == null)
|
||||
transaction = await ct.Database.BeginTransactionAsync();
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
WorkOrderItemExpense dbObject = await ct.WorkOrderItemExpense.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
ExpenseValidateCanDelete(dbObject);
|
||||
if (HasErrors)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
ct.WorkOrderItemExpense.Remove(dbObject);
|
||||
await ct.SaveChangesAsync();
|
||||
|
||||
//Log event
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.DeleteObjectLogAsync(UserId, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense, dbObject.Id, "woitem:" + dbObject.WorkOrderItemId.ToString(), ct);
|
||||
await Search.ProcessDeletedObjectKeywordsAsync(dbObject.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense, ct);
|
||||
//await TagBiz.ProcessDeleteTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
await FileUtil.DeleteAttachmentsForObjectAsync(BizType, dbObject.Id, ct);
|
||||
await ExpenseHandlePotentialNotificationEvent(AyaEvent.Deleted, dbObject);
|
||||
//Log event
|
||||
await EventLogProcessor.DeleteObjectLogAsync(UserId, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense, dbObject.Id, "woitem:" + dbObject.WorkOrderItemId.ToString(), ct);
|
||||
await Search.ProcessDeletedObjectKeywordsAsync(dbObject.Id, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense, ct);
|
||||
//await TagBiz.ProcessDeleteTagsInRepositoryAsync(ct, dbObject.Tags);
|
||||
await FileUtil.DeleteAttachmentsForObjectAsync(BizType, dbObject.Id, ct);
|
||||
if (parentTransaction == null)
|
||||
await transaction.CommitAsync();
|
||||
await ExpenseHandlePotentialNotificationEvent(AyaEvent.Deleted, dbObject);
|
||||
}
|
||||
catch
|
||||
{
|
||||
//Just re-throw for now, let exception handler deal, but in future may want to deal with this more here
|
||||
throw;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//VALIDATION
|
||||
//
|
||||
private async Task ExpenseValidateAsync(WorkOrderItemExpense proposedObj, WorkOrderItemExpense currentObj)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//run validation and biz rules
|
||||
bool isNew = currentObj == null;
|
||||
|
||||
if (proposedObj.WorkOrderItemId == 0)
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.VALIDATION_REQUIRED, "WorkOrderItemId");
|
||||
else if (!await ItemExistsAsync(proposedObj.WorkOrderItemId))
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.VALIDATION_INVALID_VALUE, "WorkOrderItemId");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//Any form customizations to validate?
|
||||
var FormCustomization = await ct.FormCustom.AsNoTracking().SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.FormKey == AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense.ToString());
|
||||
if (FormCustomization != null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//Yeppers, do the validation, there are two, the custom fields and the regular fields that might be set to required
|
||||
|
||||
//validate users choices for required non custom fields
|
||||
RequiredFieldsValidator.Validate(this, FormCustomization, proposedObj);//note: this is passed only to add errors
|
||||
|
||||
//validate custom fields
|
||||
// CustomFieldsValidator.Validate(this, FormCustomization, proposedObj.CustomFields);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
private void ExpenseValidateCanDelete(WorkOrderItemExpense obj)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (obj == null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_FOUND, "id");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//re-check rights here necessary due to traversal delete from Principle object
|
||||
if (!Authorized.HasDeleteRole(CurrentUserRoles, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense))
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_AUTHORIZED);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//INDEXING
|
||||
//
|
||||
@@ -1314,13 +1269,61 @@ use this as the basis for the children below, it's using latest methodology
|
||||
|
||||
public async Task<Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters> ExpenseGetSearchResultSummary(long id)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var obj = await ct.WorkOrderItemExpense.SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.Id == id);
|
||||
var obj = await ExpenseGetAsync(id, false);
|
||||
var SearchParams = new Search.SearchIndexProcessObjectParameters();
|
||||
if (obj != null)
|
||||
SearchParams.AddText(obj.Description).AddText(obj.Name);
|
||||
return SearchParams;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
//VALIDATION
|
||||
//
|
||||
private async Task ExpenseValidateAsync(WorkOrderItemExpense proposedObj, WorkOrderItemExpense currentObj)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//skip validation if seeding
|
||||
// if (ServerBootConfig.SEEDING) return;
|
||||
|
||||
//run validation and biz rules
|
||||
bool isNew = currentObj == null;
|
||||
|
||||
if (proposedObj.WorkOrderItemId == 0)
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.VALIDATION_REQUIRED, "WorkOrderItemId");
|
||||
else if (!await ItemExistsAsync(proposedObj.WorkOrderItemId))
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.VALIDATION_INVALID_VALUE, "WorkOrderItemId");
|
||||
|
||||
//Any form customizations to validate?
|
||||
var FormCustomization = await ct.FormCustom.AsNoTracking().SingleOrDefaultAsync(z => z.FormKey == AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense.ToString());
|
||||
if (FormCustomization != null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//Yeppers, do the validation, there are two, the custom fields and the regular fields that might be set to required
|
||||
|
||||
//validate users choices for required non custom fields
|
||||
RequiredFieldsValidator.Validate(this, FormCustomization, proposedObj);//note: this is passed only to add errors
|
||||
|
||||
//validate custom fields
|
||||
// CustomFieldsValidator.Validate(this, FormCustomization, proposedObj.CustomFields);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void ExpenseValidateCanDelete(WorkOrderItemExpense obj)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (obj == null)
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_FOUND, "id");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//re-check rights here necessary due to traversal delete from Principle object
|
||||
if (!Authorized.HasDeleteRole(CurrentUserRoles, AyaType.WorkOrderItemExpense))
|
||||
{
|
||||
AddError(ApiErrorCode.NOT_AUTHORIZED);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
||||
// NOTIFICATION PROCESSING
|
||||
//
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user