This commit is contained in:
@@ -128,38 +128,6 @@ CURRENTLY DOING: INVENTORY
|
||||
do the object, it's very light, like a partassembly in nature
|
||||
once done, on part form add partserial editor where can open a form to add / remove partserials for a part
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Looking into serial numbers, I'm thinking maybe we do want to ditch partserial and warehouse link and just treat partserials like a decoration for a part
|
||||
Facts:
|
||||
Currently in v7 the only real use of trackserialnumber is to adjust the UI and compel people to use it restrictively
|
||||
in v7 the partserial table tracks all partserials forever with these columns:
|
||||
[AID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
|
||||
[APARTID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
|
||||
[APARTWAREHOUSEID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
|
||||
[ASERIALNUMBER] [nvarchar](255) NOT NULL,
|
||||
[ADATERECEIVED] [datetime] NULL,
|
||||
[ADATECONSUMED] [datetime] NULL,
|
||||
[AWORKORDERITEMPARTID] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
|
||||
[APURCHASEORDERRECEIPTITEMID] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
|
||||
[AADJUSTMENTID] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
|
||||
[ACREATED] [datetime] NOT NULL,
|
||||
[AMODIFIED] [datetime] NOT NULL,
|
||||
[ACREATOR] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
|
||||
[AMODIFIER] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
|
||||
[AAVAILABLE] [bit] NOT NULL,
|
||||
however, nowhere in the UI does it expose the datereceived or dateconsumed which are redundant anyway because they mirror the PO (received) and the WorkorderItemapart (consumed)
|
||||
Uses of serial in v7
|
||||
See what exact serial was installed / used for warranty tracking purposes
|
||||
This is accomplished as easily by picking from a pool of serials or typing one in as long as it displays on the printed workorder adn is saved with it for historical lookup
|
||||
See what serials are in which warehouse for inventory stock keeping
|
||||
but...does this really matter, it's just makework isn't it? They really care most about the quantity surely?
|
||||
I'm sure *someone* somewhere cares which exact serial is where but do the majority of our users?
|
||||
maybe if it was reporting a theft or something? But then do the insurance people really care and couldn't it be reconstructed from teh available serials list and what is still not stolen?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user