This commit is contained in:
@@ -41,33 +41,6 @@ todo: Customer access
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
//reporting to do now
|
||||
|
||||
todo: case 4021 what is desired is a group by technician to show billable hours totals using workorder item labor report
|
||||
maybe can make some javascript to reshape the data by hoisting the woitemlabor up and out, like invert the tree or something to that effect
|
||||
want to avoid doing it at the server but if necessary then look into how to get db to do it, i.e. can it pull the same list but grouped by first somehow??
|
||||
or maybe the server can do the javascript equivalent to re-shape the data but as some kind of post process before it feeds it back to the report
|
||||
i.e. grouping in c# not in javascript inside the headless browser.
|
||||
try js first and see if too slow then get down to deets
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
todo: Add registered company name to the server meta data then use that on reports
|
||||
also, probably should add company address postal/physical and phone / email / web so that they can also be used in reports.
|
||||
format this as close as possible to the way it works for customer addresses in reports so techniques are same
|
||||
Add HasPostalAddress, HasAddress or whatever it's called convenience helpers that are true when anything is entered into the combined address fields so not blank
|
||||
or maybe just the one address field for starters
|
||||
Yes, access to the registered company name would be good for report templates - I would expect to use this on PO orders for external vendors, and WO and Quotes that would be for customers
|
||||
Sure, access to pre-entered company address, email, phone could be of use - advise IF you are going to OR not, so that it is known to me that report templates still need editing if you will be eventually providing.
|
||||
ALSO note that as these (address, email, phone) would be manually entered by the end user, would have to include IF statements to check these fields, otherwise to show preset text if not there. As long as you are ok with this that the report template has to do more checking, then sure.
|
||||
I don't know what else at this exact moment
|
||||
xo
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user