This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ todo: if SAAS needs to do some things differently:
|
||||
SERVER - hide any info about the droplet technical stuff like ram and ops stuff, we don't want them to have an idea how much memory they can have, or do we?
|
||||
maybe it's a plust because we can say you get a maximum storage for attachments of XXGb based on droplet size and it's an add-on to go with a bigger server??
|
||||
Because some people need it and will pay for it if it's offered.
|
||||
SERVER - how to cap bandwidth, storage, whatever we get billed extra for from d.o.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -70,13 +71,18 @@ todo: SAAS different license checking method to ensure only *we* are hosting it
|
||||
Try it on a phone, it looks shitty on my phone the images are way too small
|
||||
I need to rethink the website images
|
||||
also it needs a summarizing paragraph at the top with links not just jump right into features
|
||||
So many competitors are selling credit cards, payment processing all manner of weird shit I guess for extra revenue, maybe people see that and go wtf, couldn't hurt to say something alluding to that
|
||||
Service management software. (no credit cards or other funkiness) we sell software not credit cards or whatever sounds good
|
||||
Images need to be clickable to zoom in on them figure out how to do that hopefully bootstrap has built in thing
|
||||
Needing pricing and plans to be broken out by type maybe with a calculator to figure price
|
||||
NOTE: for the new website when marketing the plans Subscription vs perpetual etc there is a lot of useful ideas in the links I've been using for pricing to get some text content for the pages to help people choose.
|
||||
i.e. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/basic-differences-between-saas-subscription-perpetual-frederic-hanika
|
||||
"What other reasons would a customer have to use SaaS or ask for a subscription instead of a perpetual license? Well, a very often-observed point is frustration with internal IT that has very long delivery cycles and are usually themselves very restricted by internal budgets and, hence, cannot deliver new functionality short term. Another large point in favor of a subscription contract from the customer perspective often is to avoid lengthy capital expenditure approval processes. Subscriptions can be and hence usually are priced to fit into the budgets of departments, which means the decisions can be made there and don’t need to be funneled into complicated corporate approval processes.
|
||||
How does this impact the software vendor on the other side? A shift in buying power from central buyers to more departmental buyers, the need for more business and solution oriented sales approaches and usually much shorter sales cycles."
|
||||
|
||||
Look at competitors how they list features and what is first etc, here's some:
|
||||
https://www.housecallpro.com/pricing/
|
||||
https://getjobber.com/pricing/
|
||||
https://aifieldmanagement.com/plans-pricing/ (for what it's worth, veyr confusing site)
|
||||
|
||||
- SHAREIT product codes once have pricing figured out fully and agreed on by joyce
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user