This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,11 +6,6 @@ PRIORITY - ALWAYS Lowest level stuff first
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: Licensing - make sure tech type use license works properly: a tech license is consumed if a user has
|
|
||||||
**any one** of the four roles of TechFull, TechLimited, SubcontractorFull, SubcontractorLimited
|
|
||||||
NO, NOT TRUE AT ALL, those are authorization roles, not user types, it's coded properly already
|
|
||||||
todo: usertype scheduleable? Or sb Service and nonScheduleble sb NonService and subcontractor sb ServiceContractor?
|
todo: usertype scheduleable? Or sb Service and nonScheduleble sb NonService and subcontractor sb ServiceContractor?
|
||||||
will require some renaming of things but this is more logical and meets intended usage
|
will require some renaming of things but this is more logical and meets intended usage
|
||||||
todo: Pick a consistent single letter lambda expression variable and standardize on it.
|
todo: Pick a consistent single letter lambda expression variable and standardize on it.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user