This commit is contained in:
@@ -345,17 +345,22 @@ CURRENTLY DOING: labors
|
||||
|
||||
todo: address setting - rather than setting it *at* the client automatically shouldn't it set at the server automatically?
|
||||
this would remove some weight from the client and with a forcefullrefresh system in place that will help with this as well.
|
||||
todo: customer change is fetching both address and alert notes at the same time
|
||||
since server detects change anyway couldn't that be part of the refresh?? or is that too much?
|
||||
|
||||
todo: since a contract change is resulting in refresh no need to retun the full object, just a flag that says refresh maybe??
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
todo: check contract expiry for applying!!
|
||||
|
||||
todo: Test back end correctly sets contract on new wo and correctly sets response time (complete by date) on NEW workorder
|
||||
|
||||
todo: remove contract control entirely from code
|
||||
todo:
|
||||
|
||||
todo: Server new wo auto contract resolution code,
|
||||
if NEW record and contractid already set then use that otherwise find effective one and set (only way it's set automatically)
|
||||
|
||||
todo: alert notes should show the object name and type above the notes for quick clarity
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
todo: replicate labor save code at front and back to the other contracted objects
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user