This commit is contained in:
@@ -190,20 +190,21 @@ todo: Changes to allow in place updates of server:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
CURRENTLY DOING: Contract form - rates list and restrict to rates checkbox etc
|
CURRENTLY DOING: Contract form - rates list and restrict to rates checkbox etc
|
||||||
|
need restrict to rates checkbox, then help docs and then done
|
||||||
dupe the tagged part adjustments for service and travel then on to the limited rates, also need restrict to rates checkbox, then help docs and then done
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: service rates contract list
|
todo: service rates contract list
|
||||||
sb display viz
|
No dupes rule at server
|
||||||
add via form even though only one item, more efficient
|
limit to contract rates only in picklist???
|
||||||
edit / remove via form
|
|
||||||
|
todo: form save full update like po
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: edit item by item being passed in is flawed potentially because it looks for ID to match when in reality it should pass the index
|
todo: edit item by item being passed in is flawed potentially because it looks for ID to match when in reality it should pass the index
|
||||||
because id is 0 for added items and there could be two added items
|
because id is 0 for added items and there could be two added items
|
||||||
every op should be by index to ensure it works properly
|
every op should be by index to ensure it works properly
|
||||||
go back and fix the ones by looking at teh edit first to find the by id and then switchup to index like for contract service rates which does it correctly
|
go back and fix the ones by looking at teh edit first to find the by id and then switchup to index like for contract service rates which does it correctly
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: contractrate checkbox missing in rates
|
todo: limit to contractrate checkbox missing in rates
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: might want to put more fields in the contractdatalist, it's very sparse adn the old v7 had pretty much all the fields as well
|
todo: might want to put more fields in the contractdatalist, it's very sparse adn the old v7 had pretty much all the fields as well
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user