From c4ab38cb8f8a5fe4549ddfea6ba50566c17a1bbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Cardinal Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 23:39:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] --- ayanova/devdocs/todo.txt | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ayanova/devdocs/todo.txt b/ayanova/devdocs/todo.txt index dac3b2ab..d5506905 100644 --- a/ayanova/devdocs/todo.txt +++ b/ayanova/devdocs/todo.txt @@ -508,13 +508,14 @@ todo:2 many biz objects are not using new PUT methodology ######################################################################################################################## -CURRENTLY DOING: +CURRENTLY DOING: reseed failing due to new objects and order of db erase etc todo MISC: + Errors in erase dbutil code if there is already data and trigger seed from UI + Exception thrown: 'System.Exception' in AyaNova.dll: 'Seeder::SeedKnownObjects error creating quote status +LT:ErrorAPI2206, field: Name' - Notification code from workorder/quote/pm *item* grandchildren? Why is this a thing? shouldn't it be removed entirely, it's jsut wasted cpu cycles - can a user even subscribe to any of these? Should they? check that jobs don't run during seeding see if server jobs are staggered (i.e. don't run at the same time) maybe set the repeat interval off by a small amount so they can't sync up? @@ -522,6 +523,9 @@ todo MISC: But even so, staggering the repeat interval will mean less jobs running in the same overall job cycle ITEMS section of workorder form needs to stand out somehow more, maybe a splash of color in the icon or something + + workorderitemloan field in loanunit?? + wtf?