This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,6 +22,13 @@ FIRST CLIENT SOURCE CODE COMMIT JAN 3rd 2019
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
# OUTSTANDING MAJOR AREAS TO BETA
|
# OUTSTANDING MAJOR AREAS TO BETA
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# NOW DOING: - triaging list of must have widgets, cleaning up layout to squeeze them in (maybe done), then finishing up the must haves
|
||||||
|
make sure nice to haves or not done get cased somewhere for future v.next or whatever
|
||||||
|
figuring out the seed data adn will it suffice for widgets required once have figured out widgets required
|
||||||
|
(demand drives features not features awaiting demand)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# SEEDING ISSUES
|
||||||
seeder wolabor is being created in the future fucking the kpi stuff or at least looking weird
|
seeder wolabor is being created in the future fucking the kpi stuff or at least looking weird
|
||||||
no labor or date centric items should be created in the future, that's nonsensical
|
no labor or date centric items should be created in the future, that's nonsensical
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -34,10 +41,9 @@ seeder wo need new fields and generate data to show off and test kpi widgets and
|
|||||||
Also, can we calc "time to respond" based on anything extant or should there be some kind of additional field / system for that
|
Also, can we calc "time to respond" based on anything extant or should there be some kind of additional field / system for that
|
||||||
i.e. maybe a workorder status is also a response status like some are closed??, then a mirror first response field like completeddate
|
i.e. maybe a workorder status is also a response status like some are closed??, then a mirror first response field like completeddate
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
dashboard widgets
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
should support multiple copies if an item is configurable
|
# WIDGET ISSUES
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Widgets to make for beta in order of priority
|
- Widgets to make for beta in order of priority
|
||||||
**MUST HAVE***
|
**MUST HAVE***
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user