This commit is contained in:
@@ -424,16 +424,14 @@ todo: many biz objects are not using new PUT methodology
|
|||||||
CURRENTLY DOING:
|
CURRENTLY DOING:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: Status on work order doesn't seem to be preventing "Who can select" by role properly
|
todo: Status on work order seeded data roles are really fucked up and include some dubious roles and needs to also have some for tech - restricted specfically
|
||||||
Make it not present status that are not supposed to be available
|
|
||||||
put a back end rule in validation to prevent it as well
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Also, the seeded data roles are really fucked up and include some dubious roles and needs to also have some for tech - restricted specfically
|
|
||||||
i.e. they need to be logically correct as to what roles can select
|
i.e. they need to be logically correct as to what roles can select
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: expose Roles as optional column for report templates list
|
todo: expose Roles as optional column for report templates list
|
||||||
|
todo: expose Roles as optional column for work order status list
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: units on work order are not limited to customer on work order??
|
todo: units on work order are not limited to customer on work order??
|
||||||
TODO 1: Test address / units select alternate when have units working
|
TODO 1: Test address / units select alternate when have units working
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user