This commit is contained in:
@@ -198,25 +198,6 @@ todo: workorder Status table joined to Workorder
|
|||||||
Has fields for statusid, workorderid, timestamp, userid
|
Has fields for statusid, workorderid, timestamp, userid
|
||||||
Write only, always just adds to the table
|
Write only, always just adds to the table
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: workorder notifications remove #30 and #32 as redundant
|
|
||||||
WorkorderStatusChange = 4,//* Workorder object, any *change* of status including from no status (new) to a specific conditional status ID value
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
WorkorderStatusAge = 24,//* Workorder object Created / Updated, conditional on exact status selected IdValue, Tags conditional, advance notice can be set
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
//THESE TWO ARE REDUNDANT:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
this is actually workorderstatuschange because can just pick any status under workorderstatuschange to be notified about
|
|
||||||
WorkorderFinished = 30, //*Service work order is set to any status that is flagged as a "Finished" type of status. Customer & User
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
//This one could be accomplished with WorkorderStatusAge, just pick a finished status and set a time frame and wala!
|
|
||||||
WorkorderFinishedFollowUp = 32, //* Service workorder closed status follow up again after this many TIMESPAN
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: CHANGE WorkorderFinishStatusOverdue = 15,//* Workorder object not set to a "Finished" flagged workorder status type in selected time span from creation of workorder
|
|
||||||
Change this to a new type that is based on so many days *without* being set to a particular status
|
|
||||||
but first check if tied to contract response time stuff, how that's handled
|
|
||||||
that's closeby date in v7 but isn't that deprecated now without a "close"?
|
|
||||||
maybe I do need the Finished status bool thing above
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: workorder global setting of which roles can change a workorder status??
|
todo: workorder global setting of which roles can change a workorder status??
|
||||||
in place of making certain status role specific? (above)
|
in place of making certain status role specific? (above)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user