admin/raven-client
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
John Cardinal
2019-10-22 19:24:25 +00:00
parent a07100383c
commit 4c933ee0c4
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
ayanova/devdocs/todo.txt
View File

@@ -163,7 +163,8 @@ TODO: AUTOMATIC TEST
- Once widget form is solid then need an automatic UI test for it to get that ball rolling and to ensure no slips during development - Once widget form is solid then need an automatic UI test for it to get that ball rolling and to ensure no slips during development
- Ideally it will test every input component and validate the entire record round trips properly, maybe it needs to also try different states like creating new, editing etc - Ideally it will test every input component and validate the entire record round trips properly, maybe it needs to also try different states like creating new, editing etc
TODO: Server needs to do widget validation 666 test rules not only in debug mode so can test when put up to the devops server TODO: Server needs to do widget validation 666.66 dollar amount test rules not only in debug mode so can test when put up to the devops server
- Test code is in widgetbiz.cs around line 445, but do we need it? Maybe just find a proper server error that can be made to happen naturally?
TODO: INVESTIGATE - DO I need to institute a back button? (in APP MODE?? installed to "desktop" on device will I be able to easily navigate without back and forward buttons) TODO: INVESTIGATE - DO I need to institute a back button? (in APP MODE?? installed to "desktop" on device will I be able to easily navigate without back and forward buttons)
TODO: INVESTIGATE / REDO THE TOP LEVEL SHELL - TIME TO MARKET / Is my shell layout fucked? TODO: INVESTIGATE / REDO THE TOP LEVEL SHELL - TIME TO MARKET / Is my shell layout fucked?
- wouldn't it just suck to have all those lists exposed at once in inventory? - wouldn't it just suck to have all those lists exposed at once in inventory?