This commit is contained in:
@@ -382,32 +382,28 @@ todo: many biz objects are not using new PUT methodology
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
CURRENTLY DOING: Signature boilerplate text from global settings
|
CURRENTLY DOING:
|
||||||
maybe store in global first fetch or cache if needed only??
|
|
||||||
won't change much but most people won't need it either
|
|
||||||
can I fetch it on first wo open like the rest of the bundle?? somehow?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo 3: signature: report helper display signature and form ui control to capture /display signature
|
|
||||||
for both tech and customer
|
|
||||||
case 3682 implies code to steal to make signatures better so look into that
|
|
||||||
case 2052 is this one
|
|
||||||
case 3673 also directly related
|
|
||||||
v7 import - must put in block at least if not code immediately to import v7 sigs into svg format for display
|
|
||||||
also, depending on ease, it might make sense to have v8 server check type of image i.e. does it start with svg or not and
|
|
||||||
then auto convert if necessary.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3720 3: BUMPABLE CASE I THINK prevent double booking a tech (some kind of warning)
|
3720 3: BUMPABLE CASE I THINK prevent double booking a tech (some kind of warning)
|
||||||
availability feature??? maybe bump as a new availablity feature where user picks from a popup schedule for that tech?
|
availability feature??? maybe bump as a new availablity feature where user picks from a popup schedule for that tech?
|
||||||
if not maybe a alert from the workorder itself when they save saying double booked??
|
if not maybe a alert from the workorder itself when they save saying double booked??
|
||||||
Searching time series and userid is a bit slow maybe or needs custom query not ef able??
|
Searching time series and userid is a bit slow maybe or needs custom query not ef able??
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
IDEA:
|
||||||
|
global setting allow double booking or not
|
||||||
|
if allowed then no check
|
||||||
|
if not allowed then validation code at server checks and barfs if already booked for that user
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3873 3: subtree woitem lists implement
|
3873 3: subtree woitem lists implement
|
||||||
must be some planning on this, forget what I decided exactly
|
must be some planning on this, forget what I decided exactly
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3891 3: Implement a workable duplication system
|
||||||
|
SEE CASE 3891 for duplicate at client idea
|
||||||
|
Also this is a "3" because this idea rocks and I will likely need to remove duplicate route from every biz object at server and replace with dupe at client instead
|
||||||
|
actually should be quick and easy theoretically since it's a slight variation of the technique used to make new objects and then move to their id with data intact
|
||||||
|
and just setting a few values to 0 or null like concurrency/ id etc
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo 2: open object handler for workorder descendants **VERY IMPORTANT**
|
todo 2: open object handler for workorder descendants **VERY IMPORTANT**
|
||||||
1) get the id of the workorder and item to open from the server using descendant to wo ID
|
1) get the id of the workorder and item to open from the server using descendant to wo ID
|
||||||
2) pass that on to the workorder from
|
2) pass that on to the workorder from
|
||||||
@@ -418,8 +414,6 @@ todo: how to directly open a workorder quickly when you know the wo number??
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: picking from part assembly to populate a bunch of parts??
|
todo: picking from part assembly to populate a bunch of parts??
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo 2-3: Implement a workable duplication system
|
|
||||||
SEE CASE 3891 for duplicate at client idea
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
todo: as part of duplication above, REMOVE TEMPLATES ENTIRELY??
|
todo: as part of duplication above, REMOVE TEMPLATES ENTIRELY??
|
||||||
If can duplicate this way at client and can easily change customer etc do we even need the wo templates anymore?
|
If can duplicate this way at client and can easily change customer etc do we even need the wo templates anymore?
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user